Mighty

Mighty

Trust Center

trymighty.ai operates in the AI-powered Fraud Detection and Document Verification industry, offering a subscription-based SaaS model with API usage.

The vendor processes highly sensitive customer data, including financial records and personal identification, to detect fraud and manipulation.

A breach could lead to significant client impact.

The company's main domain is trymighty.ai.

According to their public documentation, they are committed to security and compliance, claiming adherence to frameworks such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001, with audit documentation available upon request.

Their service is designed to analyze submitted content and then discard it by default, aiming to minimize data retention.

Their security program includes vulnerability management, access controls via API keys and SSO, and encryption for data in transit.

Controls

Comprehensive overview of the security control frameworks we run — grouped by category so you can jump straight to the domain you care about.

Control Environment

  • Code of Conduct acknowledged by employees and enforced

    Employees are required to acknowledge the code of conduct upon hiring. Any violations may result in disciplinary action as outlined in the company’s disciplinary policy.

  • Board oversight briefings conducted (SOC 2)

    Senior management briefs the board of directors, or an appropriate subcommittee, at least once a year on the company’s cybersecurity and privacy risk posture. The board offers guidance and feedback to management as necessary.

  • Audit controls implemented

    The company has implemented hardware, software, and procedural mechanisms to log and review activity within information systems that store or process electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

  • Security awareness training implemented

    Employees are required to complete security awareness training within 30 days of being hired and at least once a year thereafter.

  • Security policies established and reviewed

    The company’s information security policies and procedures are formally documented and reviewed at least once a year.

  • Employee background checks performed

    The company conducts background screenings for all new hires.

  • Board meetings conducted

    The board of directors meets at least once a year and keeps formal minutes of its meetings. It includes members who are independent of the company.

  • Board charter documented

    The board of directors has a formal charter that defines its oversight responsibilities related to internal controls.

  • Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

    The organization conducts regular reviews to ensure compliance with its information security policy, topic-specific policies, rules, and standards.

  • Board expertise developed

    The board possesses the necessary expertise to oversee management’s design, implementation, and operation of information security controls, and consults external security experts when needed.

  • Code of Conduct acknowledged by contractors

    The company mandates that contractor agreements either include a code of conduct or refer to the company’s own code of conduct.

  • Performance evaluations conducted

    Managers are required to conduct performance evaluations for their direct reports at least once a year.

Communication and Information

  • Code of Conduct acknowledged by employees and enforced

    Employees are required to acknowledge the code of conduct upon hiring. Any violations may result in disciplinary action as outlined in the company’s disciplinary policy.

  • Data integrity maintained

    The company has implemented policies and procedures to safeguard electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI) against unauthorized alteration or destruction.

  • Third-party agreements established

    The company maintains written agreements with vendors and third parties, which include applicable confidentiality and privacy commitments.

  • System changes communicated

    The company notifies authorized internal users of system changes.

  • Security policies established and reviewed

    The company’s information security policies and procedures are formally documented and reviewed at least once a year.

  • System changes externally communicated

    The company informs customers of critical system changes that could impact their processing.

Risk Assessment

  • Risk assessment objectives specified

    The company defines its objectives to support the identification and assessment of risks associated with achieving them.

  • Risks assessments performed

    The company performs risk assessments at least annually. This process includes identifying threats and changes (environmental, regulatory, and technological) that may affect service commitments, formally assessing the related risks, and considering how potential fraud could impact the achievement of objectives.

  • Annual risk assessment performed annually

    The company performs the risk assessment process at least annually and whenever significant changes occur in the environment, such as acquisitions, mergers, or relocations.

  • Infrastructure performance monitored

    The company uses an infrastructure monitoring tool to track systems, infrastructure, and performance, generating alerts when predefined thresholds are reached.

  • Audit controls implemented

    The company has implemented hardware, software, and procedural mechanisms to log and review activity within information systems that store or process electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

  • Change management procedures enforced

    The company requires changes to software and infrastructure components to be authorized, documented, tested, reviewed, and approved before being implemented in the production environment.

  • Risk management program established

    The company maintains a documented risk management program that provides guidance on identifying potential threats, assessing the significance of associated risks, and implementing mitigation strategies.

  • Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

    The organization conducts regular reviews to ensure compliance with its information security policy, topic-specific policies, rules, and standards.

Monitoring Activities

  • Board oversight briefings conducted (SOC 2)

    Senior management briefs the board of directors, or an appropriate subcommittee, at least once a year on the company’s cybersecurity and privacy risk posture. The board offers guidance and feedback to management as necessary.

  • Audit controls implemented

    The company has implemented hardware, software, and procedural mechanisms to log and review activity within information systems that store or process electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

  • Security controls evaluated

    The company conducts periodic technical and nontechnical evaluations, initially based on the HIPAA Security Rule, and subsequently in response to environmental or operational changes affecting the security of electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI), to determine whether its security policies and procedures continue to meet the requirements of the HIPAA Security Rule (Subpart C).

  • Nonconformity and corrective action

    When a nonconformity is identified, the organization: 1. Responds to the issue by: a) Taking action to control and correct it b) Addressing any resulting consequences 2. Assesses the need for action to prevent recurrence or occurrence elsewhere by: a) Reviewing the nonconformity b) Identifying its root causes c) Determining whether similar issues exist or could potentially arise 3. Implements necessary corrective actions 4. Evaluates the effectiveness of those actions 5. Updates the information security management system as needed Corrective actions are proportionate to the impact of the nonconformities. Documented information is retained to demonstrate: 1. The nature of the nonconformities and the actions taken 2. The results of any corrective actions

  • Critical system review performed quarterly (SOC 2)

    For service providers, the company performs reviews at least quarterly to confirm personnel comply with security policies and operational procedures.

Control Activities

  • Audit controls implemented

    The company has implemented hardware, software, and procedural mechanisms to log and review activity within information systems that store or process electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

  • Development lifecycle established

    The company has a formal systems development life cycle (SDLC) methodology that governs the development, acquisition, implementation, maintenance, and changes (including emergency changes) of information systems and related technology requirements.

  • Security controls evaluated

    The company conducts periodic technical and nontechnical evaluations, initially based on the HIPAA Security Rule, and subsequently in response to environmental or operational changes affecting the security of electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI), to determine whether its security policies and procedures continue to meet the requirements of the HIPAA Security Rule (Subpart C).

  • Documentation change control

    System documentation shall be subject to revision and change control procedures that maintain an audit trail documenting time-sequenced development and modifications.

  • Security policies established and reviewed

    The company’s information security policies and procedures are formally documented and reviewed at least once a year.

  • Risk management program established

    The company maintains a documented risk management program that provides guidance on identifying potential threats, assessing the significance of associated risks, and implementing mitigation strategies.

  • Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

    The organization conducts regular reviews to ensure compliance with its information security policy, topic-specific policies, rules, and standards.

  • Operational system checks

    Operational system checks shall be used, as appropriate, to enforce permitted sequencing of steps and events.

Logical and Physical Access Controls

  • Network firewalls utilized

    The company uses firewalls configured to block unauthorized access.

  • Asset disposal procedures utilized

    The company ensures electronic media containing confidential information is purged or destroyed following best practices, with certificates of destruction issued for each device.

  • Securely dispose of data (SOC 2)

    The organization securely disposes of data in accordance with the documented data management process, ensuring that disposal methods are appropriate for the sensitivity of the data.

  • Data center access reviewed

    The company reviews data center access at least once a year.

  • Access reviews conducted

    The company performs access reviews at least quarterly for in-scope system components to ensure access is appropriately restricted. Required changes are tracked to completion.

  • Network segmentation implemented

    The company’s network is segmented to block unauthorized access to customer data.

  • Data encryption utilized

    The company encrypts datastores containing sensitive customer data at rest.

  • Malicious software protection implemented

    The company has implemented procedures to guard against, detect, and report malicious software.

  • Password policy enforced

    The company requires passwords for in-scope system components to be configured in accordance with its policy.

  • Remote access encrypted enforced

    The company restricts remote access to production systems to authorized employees using an approved encrypted connection.

  • Security patches installed within one month

    The company installs critical security patches within one month of their release, as determined by the risk ranking process defined in VPM-4.

  • Intrusion detection system utilized

    The company uses an intrusion detection system to continuously monitor its network and detect potential security breaches early.

  • Visitor procedures enforced

    The company requires visitors to sign in, wear a visitor badge, and be escorted by an authorized employee when accessing the data center or other secure areas.

  • Access control procedures established

    The company’s access control policy outlines requirements for the following access control functions: 1. Adding new users 2. Modifying users 3. Removing user access

  • Physical access processes established

    The company has processes for granting, modifying, and revoking physical access to data centers based on authorization from control owners.

  • System access limitation

    System access shall be restricted to authorized individuals.

  • Data transmission encrypted

    The company uses secure transmission protocols to encrypt confidential and sensitive data when it is transmitted over public networks.

  • Authority checks

    Authority checks shall restrict system use, electronic signing, access to operations or system input/output devices, record alteration, and performance of the operation at hand to authorized individuals.

  • Firewall access restricted

    The company limits privileged access to the firewall to authorized users who have a valid business need.

System Operations

  • Continuity and disaster recovery plans tested

    The company has a documented Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) plan, which is tested at least once a year.

  • Contingency plan established

    The company has established and implements, as needed, policies and procedures for responding to emergencies or other events (such as fire, vandalism, system failure, or natural disaster) that may damage systems containing electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

  • Incident management procedures followed

    The company’s security and privacy incidents are logged, tracked, resolved, and communicated to affected or relevant parties by management in accordance with its security incident response policy and procedures.

  • Log management utilized

    The company uses a log management tool to detect events that could potentially affect its ability to meet security objectives.

  • Infrastructure performance monitored

    The company uses an infrastructure monitoring tool to track systems, infrastructure, and performance, generating alerts when predefined thresholds are reached.

  • Audit controls implemented

    The company has implemented hardware, software, and procedural mechanisms to log and review activity within information systems that store or process electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

  • Vulnerability and system monitoring procedures established

    The company’s formal policies define requirements for the following IT and engineering functions: 1. Vulnerability management 2. System monitoring

  • Intrusion detection system utilized

    The company uses an intrusion detection system to continuously monitor its network and detect potential security breaches early.

  • Incident response plan tested

    The company tests its incident response plan at least once a year.

  • Incident response policies established

    The company has documented security and privacy incident response policies and procedures, which are communicated to authorized users.

Change Management

  • Change management procedures enforced

    The company requires changes to software and infrastructure components to be authorized, documented, tested, reviewed, and approved before being implemented in the production environment.

  • Development lifecycle established

    The company has a formal systems development life cycle (SDLC) methodology that governs the development, acquisition, implementation, maintenance, and changes (including emergency changes) of information systems and related technology requirements.

  • Documentation change control

    System documentation shall be subject to revision and change control procedures that maintain an audit trail documenting time-sequenced development and modifications.

  • Production deployment access restricted

    The company restricts production change migrations to authorized personnel only.

Risk Mitigation

  • Continuity and disaster recovery plans tested

    The company has a documented Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) plan, which is tested at least once a year.

  • Third-party agreements established

    The company maintains written agreements with vendors and third parties, which include applicable confidentiality and privacy commitments.

  • Contingency plan established

    The company has established and implements, as needed, policies and procedures for responding to emergencies or other events (such as fire, vandalism, system failure, or natural disaster) that may damage systems containing electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

  • Risks assessments performed

    The company performs risk assessments at least annually. This process includes identifying threats and changes (environmental, regulatory, and technological) that may affect service commitments, formally assessing the related risks, and considering how potential fraud could impact the achievement of objectives.

  • Vendor management program established

    The company has a vendor management program in place that includes: 1. Critical third-party vendor inventory 2. Vendor security and privacy requirements 3. Review of critical third-party vendors at least annually

  • Risk management program established

    The company maintains a documented risk management program that provides guidance on identifying potential threats, assessing the significance of associated risks, and implementing mitigation strategies.

Additional Criteria for Availability

  • Continuity and disaster recovery plans tested

    The company has a documented Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery (BC/DR) plan, which is tested at least once a year.

  • Contingency plan established

    The company has established and implements, as needed, policies and procedures for responding to emergencies or other events (such as fire, vandalism, system failure, or natural disaster) that may damage systems containing electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI).

  • Infrastructure performance monitored

    The company uses an infrastructure monitoring tool to track systems, infrastructure, and performance, generating alerts when predefined thresholds are reached.

  • Environmental monitoring devices implemented

    The company uses environmental monitoring devices configured to automatically alert management in the event of environmental incidents.

  • Database replication utilized

    The company’s databases are replicated in real time to a secondary data center, with alerts set up to notify administrators of any replication failures.

  • Incident response plan tested

    The company tests its incident response plan at least once a year.

  • Production data backups conducted

    The company performs periodic backups of production data, storing the backups in a separate location from the production environment.

  • Production multi-availability zones established

    The company employs a multi-location strategy for production environments to enable operations to resume at alternate data centers if a facility becomes unavailable.

  • Critical system review performed quarterly (SOC 2)

    For service providers, the company performs reviews at least quarterly to confirm personnel comply with security policies and operational procedures.

Additional Criteria for Confidentiality

  • Asset disposal procedures utilized

    The company ensures electronic media containing confidential information is purged or destroyed following best practices, with certificates of destruction issued for each device.

  • Securely dispose of data (SOC 2)

    The organization securely disposes of data in accordance with the documented data management process, ensuring that disposal methods are appropriate for the sensitivity of the data.

  • Data classification policy established

    The company has a data classification policy to ensure confidential data is properly secured and accessible only to authorized personnel.

  • Data encryption utilized

    The company encrypts datastores containing sensitive customer data at rest.

Additional Criteria for Processing integrity

  • Data integrity maintained

    The company has implemented policies and procedures to safeguard electronic Protected Health Information (ePHI) against unauthorized alteration or destruction.

  • Establish and maintain a data management process (SOC 2)

    The organization establishes and maintains a documented data management process that addresses, at a minimum: 1. Data sensitivity 2. Data owner 3. Data handling 4. Data retention limits 5. Data disposal requirements The organization aligns these elements with enterprise sensitivity and retention standards and reviews and updates the documentation annually or upon significant changes that could impact this control.

  • System validation

    Persons who use closed systems to create, modify, maintain, or transmit electronic records shall validate those systems for accuracy, reliability, consistent intended performance, and the ability to detect invalid or altered records.

  • Customer data retained

    The company retains customer transaction data for the duration of the customer account. Historical transaction data is not purged until the account is deleted.

  • Production data backups conducted

    The company performs periodic backups of production data, storing the backups in a separate location from the production environment.

  • Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security

    The organization conducts regular reviews to ensure compliance with its information security policy, topic-specific policies, rules, and standards.

  • Processing data inputs validated

    The company’s system evaluates data inputs for compliance with input requirements and generates on-screen alerts when issues with transaction inputs or processing are detected.

  • Operational system checks

    Operational system checks shall be used, as appropriate, to enforce permitted sequencing of steps and events.